Gerry
Well-Known Member
Off the line at full-throttle with a 500+ hp 6-71-blown 355 SBC, Jag IRS with no posi-traction...
![]()
Off the line at full-throttle with a 500+ hp 6-71-blown 355 SBC, Jag IRS with no posi-traction...
![]()
Like I said, tire smoke and tires tilted over, so not a full rubber pattern on the ground... Lee, if you had a straight rear axle, you would not believe the difference on launch...I myself have raced many a T with IRS units, not even close...
But they ride GREAT! and look super! I am probably going to still use a straight axle in my new T as well, I like my tires square with the road at all times, just me here...
That pic was taken at a T get-together outside Columbia, MO a couple of years ago. The location was way out in the country and there was no other traffic on that road but us Ts. A bunch of us were doing drag-race launches just to see what our cars would do. I was actually pretty impressed with how my car hooked. Saw 5# boost on the gauge on that particular launch!! :hi:Geeze Lee ... looks like there was a few practice run before the pic was taken.
![]()
I am just finishing up the fab work on my C2 corvette IRS and I think it is going to work fine but it took alot of work and alot of time..I have about 100 hrs in it already.If you decide to go with the corvette I will try to help you with deminsions and more pictures. Good luck Kip.
![]()
![]()
I am just finishing up the fab work on my C2 corvette IRS and I think it is going to work fine but it took alot of work and alot of time..I have about 100 hrs in it already.If you decide to go with the corvette I will try to help you with deminsions and more pictures. Good luck Kip.
![]()
![]()
I would drive it before making more of that design myself.. The side stress on those lower Heim joints will be great... Drive it naked for 1000 miles first, before any paint or whatever you are planning to do in the end for looks, so you can tune it up without much cost... Drive safe![]()
turnleft65,
Nice work and some interesting out-of-box thinking on your design. I'd be interested in seeing some more pics of the hub carrier attachments. It looks like you have changed the geometry of the rear from an unequal length non-parallel arm to a equal length parallel arm style...kind of hard to see in the angle of those pics. That will cure the problem that shows in Lee's pic. Of course the trade off is some loss of traction when bending them through corners with that style if you have body lean. Straight line traction or cornering? ...the choices. Are you using (or planning to use) a mount for the nose of the pinion?
It isn't hard to see where your "handle" comes from...cross torsion bars spell a circle track heritage.
Yes, the Corvette is not the easiest IRS to install but you will have a unique piece that stands out from the crowd.
I guess that I will have to do a "Ted" and point out something that would concern me if that is the finished product design and I am seeing what I think that I am seeing. That is the use of clevises for attaching the linkages to the hub carriers. They are not made for that type of service. They are for a solid mounting connection that needs the ability to change length. Yes, you can use lock nuts and leave the bolts and clevises free to pivot, but you will soon have elongated holes in the brackets. If the clevises are temporary or a figment of my imagination, please accept my apology for bringing this up. As Ted says "be safe"
Again, nice work.
And I thought there was a lot of work in a Jag IRS. I think I will stick to jags and give the Vettes a miss. My hat off to you for all that work and fabrication. You have spent a whole lot of time and I hope it works out great. Looks a million dollars to me
gerry
Helps a bunch. thanks to all for your inputFireball, if you search corvette rear in the search engine and look for my post {OptimusPrime} you will see the way I fabed up a customer's car that's got a 70's vet rear in it. Hope that helps