In most cases for the user, Using a gmail address is a convenience they should have a ISP provided one... but for you to disallow them is a necessity, or this crap will never stop. A lot of people will get that, but some sadly will never look past themselves...
All I can say is, Thanks for the work... I know that everyone will benefit from it.
Oh, trust me, I take at least one or two cussings every week, because I was already blocking Yahoo and Hotmail. I always wonder if those same people cuss the owners of brick and mortar stores with the 'No shirt, no shoes, no service' signs on the front doors? I do what I do for some very specific reasons and if someone doesn't like the way I do things, they can get on down the road.
I've been watching the denied registration logs pretty carefully. It's funny to see the trends, because it shows the people who know the ins-and-outs of using XRumer and those who do not.
Look at the bottom of the log page. A user trying to register with the username 'ergobgmi' tried to register at 7:04 AM. And the registration was rejected because that e-mail adress and IP address had already been logged into one of the anti-spam databases I'm checking against. But this bampot doesn't know how to set up his script, because he has the script try again, one minute later, but using a different IP address. By the time the second registration was attempted, at least one of the anti-spam databases had already been updated to include the username. So that means this idiot just got started, because we were the first to report that particular username.
Oh. Yeah, Had I forgotten to mention when one of these miscreants tries to register and our system marks them as a spammer, we then send all of the miscreant's details to the spam databases, to help the next forum admin?
I bluidy HATE spammers.
Look at the next 6 attempts, just above. All of then using the same e-mail address. That's a total of 8 attempts, by one bot, over a period of 11 miutes. But look at 7:14. This two ties, the script tried registering with the username 'clclpsz', just using two different IP addresses. The bot rapid-fired the username, so the anti-spam database hadn't had time to reflect the username, but it was still getting blockied by both the e-mail address and the IP address. Then at 7:15, the bot tries a new username, but didn't roll to a new e-mail or IP address, so it got trapped again. Then again at 7:15, it tried again, with an new username and another IP address.
At 7:26, a bot tried the username WeiniaVon, but got caught on all three counts. But it tried again with all the same details.
But you can see it was a bot, because there is no way a human can fill out the registration form 5 times in a single minute.
Look how the company selling the script explains their shite on their FAQ page -
2. Isn't it a spam-bot?
In no way XRumer acts like a spam-bot since spam is defined in legislation as 'unsolicited email', whereas XRumer simply posts messages created by users, which cannot be illegal providing the user does not violate the legislation by provoking racial hatred or anything prohibited by the law. Besides, in most cases XRumer is smart enough to find sections like 'Flood', 'Off topic', 'Flame', 'Chit-chat' where advertising takes place with the permission from moderators and webmasters. XRumer is not an email spam bomber and should not be confused with such software. The laws of USA, Russia, Canada, Spain, Germany, France and other countries explicitly state the illegal nature of email spam which XRumer has nothing to do with.
3. Why posting messages in forums is more efficient than spamming through email?!
See for yourself. E-mail spam has been annoying people for a long time now, and quite efficient ways of fighting unsolicited email have been developed and made publicly available. For an email spammer every 1 out of 1000 emails reaching a potential reader is already luck because 999 emails are blocked by spam filters implemented both by ISP's and home users alike. Forums and guestbooks make it way different. These are places people come to read voluntarily. Any posted message will be read at least by one moderator. But a well-composed message with correctly placed links in its body will initiate a live discussion over it, leading to clicks and high rankings in Search Engines. It's not just efficient – it's smart to a degree where most people would not believe software to be capable of.
See, this B.S. isn't being caused by a 'spam-bot'. Because that is somehow different.
And as EX JUNK can attest, the tripe is read 'at least by one moderator'. But I'm betting he wasn't buying what they were selling.
Wouldn't it be nice if Capital (misspelled intentionally) Hill would look at this kind of mayhem and write legislation to prevent it, instead of trying to pander to Hollywood's whims? Anyone want to bet Lamar Smith is going to do something about this mess?