I always love these kinds of threads. Member A posts about a problem, so Members B - Z all chime in with different ideas and different cures, all within 24 - 48 hours of Member A's initial post. Then, suddenly, Member A falls completely silent on the matter, and nothing else is ever said. As in who knows if the problem was ever fixed, or not? Not a single soul, from Member B, all the way to Member Z will ever learn what the root of the problem actually was, and what Member A did to eliminate it.
Personally, I guess I approach these threads in a different manner than most. To wit -
The problem I'm having is it pings like crazy under load if I try to set the initial timing any more than 10BTDC.
See how it starts? Bob has a motor with a 'problem', that being it 'pings like crazy'.
But check this out. In the very same post, Bob goes on to say -
The car runs and drives fine...
See? Problem fixed, even before the original post was submitted.
Now wait, just a flippin' second! How in flip's sake could the car 'run and drive fine', whilst it 'pings like crazy', under a load? Anyone else seeing this? The car runs and drives just fine, isn't that what he said? But yet, he started this thread because the car was most certainly not running just fine.
What's everyone trying to diagnose, and/or fix in this thread? The motor that pings like crazy, or the contradictory motor that runs fine?
Here is yet another example of confusion reigning supreme -
I haven't looked at the plugs in about 1500 miles. They were always a little black sooty from running rich (I assumed) after I fixed the oil burning problem. I can look at them this weekend.
Does anyone else wonder what he was going to be looking at? Plugs he admits were sooted up, plugs that have had another 1,500 street miles put on them since, but now, he plans to look at them. And get this - he admits the engine was swallowing oil, but there is no mention of any oil deposits on the plugs.
Heck, I jus' gotta know. Bob, did you look at them? If so, what, specifically, did you look at? And what, specifically, did you learn?
John, I've no clue why you suggest installing fresh plugs before the high RPM jaunt. All that is going to do is ruin a fresh set of plugs. Why not run the old plugs, then after the high RPM run, stick the trans in low gear and drive at a high RPM, until the plugs clean off the high speed deposits?
I think you have way too much compression. Try some good racing gas in it.
You will destroy the pistons with it pinging.
Get with your bad self,
@RPM . We've got a real conundrum on our hands here, and there you come along with plain, old, common-sense, trying to throw everyone off the mark.
I'd rather damn myself to perdition than read back through this thread, so someone correct me if I am wrong. I do believe it took us all the way to Post #26 of this thread, before someone questioned the quality of fuel being used.
Here's the one that grabbed me by the shirt front, Ron. He plugs the vacuum advance chamber in and the motor will not idle in gear. Where do you suppose he is hooking up that vacuum hose? I don't think anyone addressed that wee point, either.
And without any readings from a vacuum gauge, what do you think? Is that a vacuum leak I am hearing, or is my hearing going sour? Shows all the symptoms, doesn't it?
No way of knowing if there is enough P:V to be able to pull it off, but wouldn't you like to be able to tighten up that valve lash a couple thousandths, just to see what would happen?
Apologies to the rest of you for the brief aside with RPM. Please, please, let's get back to making everything harder than it has to be.
I would compression would have to be 11;1 plus in order for this to happen ... maybe put some octane booster in & see if that makes a difference ?????
I think you intended to type that you would think compression would have to be higher, but in my experience, that line of thinking would be erroneous. 10.0:1 in higher temperatures will spell disaster, unless the cam is killing enough cylinder pressure to crutch things. And between you, me, and the gatepost, I don't see that as being the case. Of course, introducing the concept of camshaft specifications having anything to do with compression and cylinder pressures is likely going to stump Bob. I've a shiny, new nickel that says the combination of the wee cam profile and the piston design is going to have Bob chasing his tail, all around the block. And that's after he fixes the other problems he has yet to discover/consider.
So. Bob. Did you get this one sorted out? Are you just planning to leave everyone in suspense?
As for the motor being lazy up to 4K, I think you've some under-lying issues. No question about it Harold (may God's eternal light shine upon him) had some really 'peaky' cam profiles. His race stuff was always fast, but it was death on valvetrains, and very, very temperamental about gear ratios. Bottom line, that cam should be showing signs of life, long before 4K.