I am not sure of this site because I am already a member but I know when I am searching the www for some answers or ideas MOST forums require you to join to read the post that google found or at a minimum they don't show the pictures unless you join. IMO all those unnecessary members are the web sites fault. I know I have had to join many forums just to read a post or see some pictures only to never return again.
Which is unusual, because Google will severely penalize a site admin for treating their bots as anything other than unregistered guests. Yes, in years gone by, there were some black-hat SEO schemes which would allow a site owner to manipulate the bots, but Google caught on, very quickly. A Google bot hits this site as an unregistered guest, so if it can 'see' content, that is the same content as any unregistered guest can see.
In the past, you did get my attention when you broadcasted a "Hey, we're running $$$ short" message. I don't know how others have responded to that kind of thing, but maybe it would help if a message like that was a regular at the beginning of the 3rd week of the month.
Throughout the years, I've considered this, but I generally back away from it. I feel as if I am meant to be wearing sack-cloth and ashes, rattling my tin coffee cup, crying out, "Alms? Alms for the poor?"
The sidebar donation module appears at the top of the stack, once you are logged in. If that progress slider doesn't get your attention, what good is it for me to be rattling my cup?
I am not trying to be mean-spirited here, it's just that I don't have a quick solution to sugar coat these words. What I am trying to say is that at the end of the day, we're all big boys and girls, and none of us would expect to go see a movie at no charge. Or play a round of golf at no charge. Or watch a premium channel on TV at no charge. Or even look at our e-mail at no charge. So, from where I sit, I cannot see how this site should be any different. I abhor the fact, but money makes the world go round. I know that sounds pretty stern, but I am not trying to be heard-hearted, I promise. Actually, if I was hard-hearted, we wouldn't be here. I would have ignored the messages, asking me to find a way to keep us afloat.
hey! the answer to a prayer! I would be embarrassed to admit I can't afford $5.00 a month. If Mike continues, I will do that! John
John, please do not feel embarrassed. If someone tells me they cannot afford a few bucks for a donation, I can take them at their word. Believe me, I've been there, and it wasn't all that long ago. That is why we are not a subscription site. But when I see the same names donating, every month, and the same names not donating, every month, I start to think that perhaps some of our content is going to be restricted for just our supporting members.
I've a good friend with our hosting company. We're testing some configurations, so if you see this site closed down for a few minutes, don't press any panic buttons. I need to grab a database backup, so we can use it in a sandbox. We're trying to hammer out some details, so we can get a quote figured. One option we are looking at is maybe me making a bit of a sideways move, by moving some of my other sites into a different machine, and running this one on that same machine. In effect, I would be hosting this site. But the downside to that one is that if I get hosed on donations, that would jeopardize the well-being of the other sites. It's funny, because all of my other sites take care of themselves, financially. But with this site, populated with people who clearly have more disposable income than the average individual, it is always a game of chance.
Just bear with me, a while longer. I appreciate all the offers that are coming in, particularly from a couple of our forum sponsors. But I now know we have some options available, which will let us keep things alive, so now, it is just a matter of deciding which option works best, all the way around.