Somebody is walkin' out of this one with a boo-boo lip, that much is certain.
I love the looks of dual quads.
Only it sounds as if there is a 'but' in there. As in, "I love the looks of dual quads, but this flippin' pig doesn't make enough torque to pull a sick prostitute off a toilet seat." Somethin' like that?
Right now I have 2- 450 cfm Holley's on a 350 chevy with a rv cam seating on Offenhauser
Ram Induction Adapters.
So, in other words, you have some unknown camshaft, which was likely designed to be used in a truck pulling a large trailer, in a 350 CID engine, that would be over-carb'ed with a single 650 CFM carburetor, only you are using 900 CFM of carburetor, on 13.500" long ram induction adapters, which were designed for use in road race applications, which means they will absolutely kill any low-end power your camshaft is designed to build.
Yeah, that combination makes
loads of sense.
Big bog right off idle or when trying to pass a car.
No! What with the way all of those parts were matched together? You're pulling our legs' right?
Watch this video, it's really short.
See those numbers, shown after the pull? That motor made peak torque at 4,700 RPM, and peak power at 6,500 RPM. Being honest with yourself, ask yourself the last time your motor saw either of those RPM levels.
Now, put that knowledge together with the simple fact that nearly every cam manufacturer that still offers something similar to an 'rv' cam has designed those profiles to work off-idle, up through about 4,500 RPM.
Will somebody, anybody, tell me how identifying a cam as an 'rv' grind is providing any kind of details, at all?!?
@ouh506 , did you bother to read
this post? Either you didn't feel it was necessary, or you are thumbing your nose at all of us, but in either instance, telling us you have an 'rv' cam is every bit as good as telling us nothing at all.
WTF does it take to make people understand? If you cannot provide us with complete details, we cannot provide you with advice to help you with your problem/s. Is it safe to assume before you came here to ask advice about this combination you refuse to tell us anything about, that maybe, just maybe, you tried to tune out your problem? If so, why can you not take the time to tell us what you have already tried? What, is this combination some kind of black ops deal, or are you just expecting us to have our crystal balls all polished up, and ready to go?
Hmmmm, now I am no rocket scientist, but if you have a cam that runs out of steam at 4,500 RPM, and an intake that wants to work really well at another 200 RPM above that, plus enough carburetor to feed air to your engine at 11,000 RPM, I am really wondering why anyone would waste time trying to make all those mis-matched parts work well together. Is coming to this conclusion really all
that difficult?
Are you still wondering about the hole the motor falls into, when you open the throttle blades? Really?
Well, that certainly sucks, doesn't it?
So I am thinking about using 2- 350 cfm two barrels.
I would think your thinking is, at the very least, a step in the right direction.
Will the 2 barrel carbs bolt "in line" to my dual quad manifold ?
Not knowing what intake manifold you have, and not knowing center-to-center on the pads, how can you reasonably expect any of us to answer that question? Yes, those carbs will fit, unless, of course they will not fit. In that case, then no, they will not fit.
Will I get better mileage ?
Not if you cannot tune the 2 bbl. carbs any better than you've tuned the 4 bbl. carbs.
How about a single 4 barrel 750 cfm ?
Other than obviously being too much carb for your application, I do not understand your question. How about what to do with a 750 CFM carb?
Determining carburetor requirements
Carb Advice
Another tunnel ram thread
Here, to save time,
let me Google that for you.
And before you waste another moment of anyone's time, go read
this post, paying careful attention to all four of those rules. And before you start whining about how poorly you've been treated, read
this post.